.NET Micro Framework

by matt 24. May 2007 22:52

This is what I was expecting Silverlight would be based on, not the CoreCLR.

So that gives us desktop CLR 1.0, 1.1, 2.0 and 2.0 for Vista (not that you'd notice by looking at the version numbers, but 2.0 on Vista has changes e.g for ASP.NET to support IIS7). .net 3 doesn't touch the CLR, but I'm not sure about 3.5.

The .net Compact Framework has gone through a couple of versions, and even has a subset for the Xbox 360. I've no idea how many versions of the .net Micro Framework there are (does this power those SPOT watches?) And now we've got the CoreCLR, which is cross platform. Oh, and Rotor and Mono, too.

Not to mention all the various service packs.

That's an awful lot of .net.

All the more reason for Microsoft to ensure that the CoreCLR is a true subset (I'm talking common code base), and is strictly compatible with the desktop CLR. I'd hate to have to work up a compatibility matrix for that lot.

Tags:

Comments

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



About the author

Something about the author

Calendar

<<July 2010>>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
2829301234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930311
2345678

View posts in large calendar

RecentComments

Comment RSS

License

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is by Matt Ellis and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

©2010 Matt Ellis