Slicing and dicing Explorer

by matt 10. December 2006 00:31

A little while ago, Long Zheng wrote a post about one of the nice little "experience" points of Windows Vista - a feature he christened "dynamic multi-dimensional scrolling", which is just a fancy way of saying that the tree view of the folders in Windows Explorer automatically scrolls so that the majority of the view isn't whitespace (go see his post for the picture/1000 words type thing).

I like it, and I agree with Long - it's not really a feature, but it does have a good, positive image on the end user's experience with Windows. I'd like to add another: the ubiquitous use of the "sorting/filtering/grouping/stacking drop down task pane from a header in Explorer's list view". (Might not be as fancy, but it's definitely a longer name than Long's.)

XP allowed you to sort items, by date, file type, whatever. You could even group on these attributes. But it was really awkward to set; a menu option buried in a sub menu on the right click. Vista's brought it front and centre, and it's a great way to slice and dice your file views.

One of the simplest yet most effective changes is to make this functionality far more discoverable by keeping the header bar visible at all times - in XP, it was only visible in details mode (which made sorting all the harder).

The feature set it exposes is terrific. It really augments the search functionality with filtering, sorting, grouping and stacking, but that's not my favourite bit. That would be finding it in places I wasn't expecting, the most surprising of which was the add/remove programs dialog. Once you've got more than a few applications installed, that list isn't the most friendly to work with. Being able to sort, group and filter (no stacking, but it's no big loss) all of my applications is brilliant. Looking for that application you just installed that's a pile of rubbish? Just filter the "installed on" date as today.

It just makes it so easy to get at your data.

Tags:

Obsession With Detail | Vista

Comments

12/17/2007 8:44:12 AM #

RE: Slicing and dicing Explorer

Yes it is nice, but it would be beyond nice - say somewhere in the kilo-nice bracket - if

a) It was implemented uniformly - see e.g. Manage Wireless Networks for one exception

rising into the deci-mega-nice if

b) Column order also had an implied sort, so that one could e.g. Group by Date Modified in column 1, Group by Type in column 2, Sort by Name in col three and so on

and gobsmackingly hyper-mega-nice if

c) Folder Views weren't as independently minded as supermarket trolleys

Can't help thinking there are still a couple of unused yoghurt pots at MS HQ...

Mr Stuff | Reply

Add comment


(Will show your Gravatar icon)

biuquote
  • Comment
  • Preview
Loading



About the author

Something about the author

Calendar

<<March 2010>>
MoTuWeThFrSaSu
22232425262728
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930311234

View posts in large calendar

RecentComments

Comment RSS

License

Creative Commons License
Except where otherwise noted, content on this site is by Matt Ellis and is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License.

©2010 Matt Ellis